|
Back
to index page
Privatisation momentum critical
As more state enterprises list, management transparency
and predictability of returns come under scrutiny

By all benchmarks, the government's privatisation
drive has made a roaring start, with overwhelming demand for
share offerings of both Internet Thailand and PTT Plc.
Solid fundamentals, reasonable pricing and
strong marketing support from the government helped both stocks
during both their initial public offerings and in secondary
market trade.
The government hopes that the momentum can
continue next year, when telecom giants, the Telephone Organisation
of Thailand and the Communications Authority of Thailand,
hold their own IPOs and list on the market.
By 2003, the government plans to list 16 state
enterprises on the Stock Exchange of Thailand, part of a broader
plan to raise state asset values and improve efficiency in
public services.
State enterprises are no strangers to the
market. Large-cap stocks such as Krung Thai Bank, PTT Exploration
and Production and Thai Airways International have been long-time
bulwarks of the exchange.
A look at the performances of listed state
enterprises reveals few common threads. For some firms, such
as Thai Airways or East Water, the stocks lack any direct
listed competitors, making analysis difficult.
Financial institutions, such as Krung Thai
Bank, the Industrial Finance Corp of Thailand or Siam Commercial
Bank, show shareholder returns on par with their private counterparts,
reflecting the overall macro-economic downturn.
On the other hand, companies such as National
Petrochemical have delivered consistently high returns ahead
of the sector average, whether on a one-year or five-year
horizon.
In several cases, investors face a dilemma:
shareholder returns can gain from the monopoly power enjoyed
by several state enterprises and their close ties to regulators
and government agencies.
Yet governance and efficiency questions can
also hurt returns, particularly going forward as market liberalisation
policies take hold.
Company boards generally remain dominated
by technocrats and political appointees, raising the prospects
of retail shareholders seeing their interests subordinated
to boarder political and social development goals.
State enterprises in the banking and energy
sectors, for instance, have long had to implement policies
aimed more at satisfying political goals rather than corporate
profits, whether it be in interest rate or lending policies
or how petrol prices are set.
Viroj Nualkhair, the president of Krung Thai
Bank, said such "interference" was inevitable so
long as the state maintained majority control.
"Whether it's the government or a private
investor, the fact is that if a single party dominates shareholdings
and the board, then you have to be concerned about whether
minor shareholders will be protected," he said.
Investors in Krung Thai Bank have actually
benefited greatly from its position as a state bank. In 1998,
the government agreed to carve 530 billion baht in bad loans
away from the bank, saving the institution from potential
bankruptcy.
Now the government has directed the bank,
the country's largest in the number of branches, to take a
lead role in lending, particularly to small and medium-sized
businesses. "It's an opportunity for us to gain over
our competitors after being at a disadvantage for a long time,"
Mr Viroj said. "Right now, the biggest spender in the
economy is the government. So that gives state-owned banks
an advantage."Another stock, PTT Exploration and Production,
has seen similar benefits from state policy, profiting from
natural gas sales to other state-owned power producers.
Another energy firm, Bangchak Petroleum, barely
merits a passing grade. Analysts say the firm is struggling
in the highly competitive retail fuel market, while its refinery
operations have been hurt by ageing equipment and lower efficiency
than at private refineries.
The country's national carrier, Thai Airways,
saw its balance sheet ravaged by the 1997 float of the baht
and fluctuations in global oil prices.
The stock recently hit historical lows, hurt
by infighting among management and board directors, prompting
the Finance Ministry to announce some weeks ago it would postpone
any new share offering until 2003.
- Cholada Ingsrisawang
Back
to index page
|