Govt cracks down on social networking forums | Bangkok Post: tech

Tech > Mobile

Govt cracks down on social networking forums

Facebook users urged to safeguard their privacy, after one Thai member is arrested on lese majeste charges

A member of the social networking website Facebook has spent the past two months in jail, accused of breaking lese majeste law in messages posted at his Facebook page.

Wipas Raksakulthai, a 37-year-old businessman based in Rayong, is being detained at the Bangkok Remand Prison. The court denied him bail.

"Even though many of his close friends disagreed with his political position, we'd never go to the police over what he allegedly wrote," says one of Mr Wipas's friends.

"Anyone could have contacted police, because he kept his posts viewable to the public," the friend says.

Mr Wipas is a supporter of the red shirt United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) and had left political comments on Facebook.

Since his arrest, Facebook users have criticised him, sharing his personal information and contacts they acquired from his profile pages.

They encourage each other to report the findings to the police.

This is thought to be the first lese majeste case against a Thai Facebook user stemming from his own disclosure of personal information and views on his Facebook page.

Like other social network websites, Facebook allows members to create a personal profile and form friends and acquaintances.

A recent survey of 1,494 internet users in Bangkok conducted by Dhurakij Pundit University reveals that Facebook is the most popular social network site for people airing their political views.

Since Mr Wipas's arrest, questions are being asked as to whether it is safe and private enough for members to air their political views and if the government has gone too far in its crackdown on internet users in this group.

About 4 million Thais use Facebook. The global figure is 400 million.

Supinya Klangnarong, a media reform activist, says the Wipas case reflects an expansion of the government's crackdown on online political dissidents, from content-based public websites into social networks.

"The case further escalates the climate of fear among internet users," she says.

"Now many people refrain from revealing their real identities on Facebook."

The government regards breaches of the lese majeste law as a threat to national security, making it risky for dissidents to express their views, she says.

Since the emergency decree was imposed on April 7, the government has managed to close at least 1,150 websites.

"We're worried that more online users may be arrested for exercising political expression," she says.

Internet users are already vulnerable to scrutiny under the Computer Crimes Act, which allows the authorities to track down their identities based on their internet protocol (IP) address. The act stipulates harsh punishment for violators who store, publish or forward information deemed a threat to national security.

But the imposition of the emergency decree has given the state more power to control dissidents, and also to hunt them down.

These include a new online crime agency that will go after violators of the lese majeste law and a so-called online scout network that encourages users to monitor violators of this and other laws, says the activist.

Even when users opt to use fake identities, the police may be able to find ways to get them by other means, she says.

However, Facebook's own privacy policy also poses concerns among its users.

The policy has been criticised for its lengthy statements, leaving users confused about what information is available to whom.

Kullatip Satararuji, a mass communications lecturer at Dhurakij Pundit University, says Facebook users should turn on their privacy settings to avoid unwanted exposure.

"We need to group our contact lists to decide which people we allow to see what, and consider the impact of such exposure," she says.

"Social media is being used as a political tool by people who want to express their views. So you have to be aware that your personal information could go public," she says.

Nutthapong Chaiwanitphon, a Facebook member, is openly critical of the government.

"I have been defriended by some friends due to my political expression, but that's okay," says the 31-year-old freelancer.

But he worries about what his business partners will think, so he excludes them from his friend lists."I can live without Facebook if I have to," he says. "Ultimately, it's just a tool to contact friends."


Contact Buyer Beware:

consumers@bangkokpost.co.th

Did you know?

You can introduce your kids to edutainment reading with our Student Weekly magazine: Thailand's only all-English entertainment and education magazine for teens and all ages.

About the author

columnist
Writer: Surasak Glahan
Position: Reporter

Your comments

  • wantmymoney

    Discussion 30 : 04/07/2010 at 02:13 AM30

    Singapore has similar law against user who criticise other races or religion, but they were never put into jail only fined. Malaysia has ISA law to arrest and detain anyone critising the UMMO ruling party. But as it is, you cant keep everyone quiet or prevent people from speaking up for themselves. This globlisation and democracy laws of nature, eventually after decades things will either for the better or deteriorate for the worst. No country can be in advanced stages as the european or US without freedom of speech, that's how it is. Can you grow a sweet mangos without its skin? Thailand need to look itself and ask where it wants to be in 10, 20 or 100 years?

  • R. Hood

    Discussion 29 : 04/07/2010 at 01:24 AM29

    Kfc is quite right about the internet and as a former telecommunications engineer I would advise people that the same is true on the telephone. It doesn't matter whether it is a fixed line or mobile. They can see as soon as you finish dialing the number that is calling and where you are. The call can be recorded and traced the second it is picked up.
    A mobile phone can be traced even when it's not being used as it constantly broadcasts it's location to the phone network.
    What you see on the movies about it taking time to trace was only true of the old analogue technology and is not true today.

  • Ricky

    Discussion 28 : 04/07/2010 at 12:26 AM28

    Only totalitarian and fascistic regimes arrest citizens for having an (political) opinion and voicing it. Big Brother is watching you .... and putting you away.1984 in Thailand. A disgrace.

  • Bubba

    Discussion 27 : 03/07/2010 at 11:21 PM27

    ANDRE M #18: In a sense there is a grain of truth in what yu say. Democracy must keep a majority happy. That is at least better than a military that doesn't give a hoot about the vast majority.

    The idea only "educated" people should vote is old stuff, app;lied by the early democracies where landowners etceteras were allowed to vote. In many countries women were considered too ignorant to vote also.

    In a sense though democracy is optimistic as it says people are good. There really are people well off who care about the less fortunate. And many of the middle class have their recent roots in the poor classes. Sadly in Thailand much of the middle class is so desperate to hang onto what they have they tend to ignore their roots, at ;east collectively because their own families are rarely forgotten.

    One problem with benevolent dictatorship is the power is so concentrated, when that benevolence turns sour there is no way out; huis clos.

  • Joe Block

    Discussion 26 : 03/07/2010 at 11:20 PM26

    The fact that we still get this reported shows that there is some level of press freedom here, now that is one thing.
    In terms of Les mejeste, it is best to stay off the topic unless proven absolutely neccessary as unwise use of your words can land you in jail. What people dont realise is, the law has been there for a long time and untouched for a long time as it was also not widely used as of this moment. The internet, while giving us ease of access to freedom of expression also gives the authority the ease of prosecutions, there is no such thing as being annonymous online unless you are quite a sophisticated hacker, they can always trace back to your physical location. To be wise, you should treat your online comments your make the same level of comments you make on a recorded television, as everything you say is recorded and can be used against you in court.

  • Bubba

    Discussion 25 : 03/07/2010 at 11:13 PM25

    R. HOOD #13: Of course. But there is more than one way to skin a cat. I was trying to be diplomatic and non-confrontational.

    Your calling a spade a spade is of course important too.

  • Kfc

    Discussion 24 : 03/07/2010 at 09:36 PM24

    When will people learn you have no privacy on the internet no matter how you set your privacy options, it's like a lock on a door it only keeps honest people out . I been telling people for decades from my experience as a PMEL technician in the USAF working with the OSI and NSA don't ever underestimate the governments abilities to spy on you.

  • Yellow Man

    Discussion 23 : 03/07/2010 at 08:33 PM23

    "Democracy is a clever scam" I agree! Only people with more than 10 million baht should be allowed to vote- only the qualified. The rest should also be banned from criticising the military-Ive heard too much of that lately.

  • Bangkok Rebel

    Discussion 22 : 03/07/2010 at 05:18 PM22

    #18: The way Andre M. is thinking smells like fascism to me... I hope the M. does not stand for Musolini. Never heard and accepted that all men are equal, even if they are illiterate? The world is not just for an elitarian minority who despises and suppresses a majority. The time of slavery is behind us... From the french Revolution we learned Liberté, Egalité and Fraternité. Those values are still very true!

  • Sceptic

    Discussion 21 : 03/07/2010 at 04:09 PM21

    Andre M #18. That is a very cynical point of view, which nonetheless contains a germ of truth. It is what Thaksin did, enabling people who previously felt they were excluded from the political process to feel instead that they were a part of it. No mean achievement - and who is to say he was wrong? And it is exactly what the present government fails to do.

    As to franchise qualifications. Sure, given the chance, anyone can vote (as well as they can make babies!). In fact Thailand has the highest level of literacy in the region - about 94.5%. Given that and my contention that the vast majority can generally distinguish right from wrong (whether they choose to act on it is another matter!)and also have a good idea where their best interests lie, they seem to me to be qualified to vote - and to express their opinions freely and openly.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.