Vietnam launches derivatives market

Vietnam launches derivatives market

Investors talk in front of stock market screens at a securities company in Hanoi on April 20, 2016. (Reuters photo)
Investors talk in front of stock market screens at a securities company in Hanoi on April 20, 2016. (Reuters photo)

HANOI - Vietnam's derivatives market will be officially launched on Aug 10, the Hanoi Stock Exchange said on Tuesday, with stock futures contracts the first to begin trading.

Derivatives trading was planned several years ago to help draw more investment to Vietnam's capital markets and broaden the country's finance industry. The futures market would initially launch stock index contracts, and when fully operational, more instruments would be introduced.

"[The launch] will help attract more foreign investors, institutional investors in particular, and boost market liquidity," the stock exchange said in a statement.

The VN30-Index, which is reviewed periodically, captures the performance of the 30 largest companies by market capitalisation on the Ho Chi Minh city stock exchange. The futures contracts are allowed to move by a maximum of 7% in each session.

The benchmark VN Index has jumped 19.1% so far this year and hit its highest level of 796.62 points since 2008 on Tuesday. 

Do you like the content of this article?

Singapore tightens traveller testing

SINGAPORE: Singapore will require additional testing for travellers and extend travel curbs to more African countries, as it rolls out more measures to allow it time to figure out how to deal with the Omicron coronavirus variant.


Thaksin denies anti-monarchy plot

Former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra has vehemently denied financially supporting anti-monarchy movements in Thailand, describing media reports to that effect as fake news and stressing he is loyal to the monarchy.


Taliban: Women's rights must be 'enforced'

The Taliban issued a decree Friday in the name of their supreme leader instructing ministries in Afghanistan “to take serious action” on women’s rights, but failed to mention girls’ access to schools.