Design and policy fusion can ease urban crush

Design and policy fusion can ease urban crush

A worker harvests fresh produce from a tower in Singapore. The state has provided some funding and research support to local vertical farming company Sky Greens, which grows vegetables at its farm to promote food security. (Reuters photo)
A worker harvests fresh produce from a tower in Singapore. The state has provided some funding and research support to local vertical farming company Sky Greens, which grows vegetables at its farm to promote food security. (Reuters photo)

Hip-hop supergroup De La Soul's fourth album title, Stakes is High, may be an appropriate message to officials, architects and urban design professionals responsible for designing and building the cities of today and tomorrow.

According to UN projections, by the year 2050, the world population will increase to 9.8 billion from 7.6 billion, and close to 66% of the population will live in cities. Rightfully so, there is growing investment in the study of our cities and whether they can be designed to respond and adapt to rapid urban densification.

To accommodate increasing populations in cities, the trend at the end of the 20th century was an emerging mixed-use building typology of office, commercial and residential hybrids -- tall towers over retail podium blocks. These structures, while showcasing our ability to engineer high and slender, often lack a proper relationship to one another. They fail to integrate into a city's fabric and struggle to find a relationship with public space, often with little reverence to their surroundings.

So, how can these buildings be reshaped to contribute to a greater quality of city life?

Take Singapore as an example. Over the past two decades, Singapore has been a prolific promoter of novel building and urban scale experiments, resulting in a city centre filled with a great diversity of spatial experiences at both ground level and at heights. It's an anomaly among its peer cities of the same size. New buildings are porous, interlinked with public transit systems below, sky bridges above, and clad with gardens. Streets are well proportioned and there is a sense that the human experience is prioritised. The combination of smart urban design, stunning high-tech architecture and a command over indoor-outdoor living represents a striking model for other cities to emulate.

Singapore's success is no accident. In large part, it is made possible by incentives and policy-making by the Singapore Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). The combination of smart policy-making and dialogue between the URA, designers and developers is a true recipe for success.

One guideline the URA has adopted, the 45-degree rule, allows developers to build open green-space amenity decks within buildings, and they can do so for free. The taller the void, the more free area can be granted. This simple rule limits wall-like developments and encourages more outdoor spaces at height.

Another policy inspires terracing building geometry rather than vertical structures, which has had a direct visual impact on the city skyline. The URA team is always tuning these incentives to guide and support smart development. Each rule has been met with inventiveness on the part of the community of architects and designers who receive them; take, for instance, the creation of Skyparks, Sky Forests and many other types of (sky) innovations, all of which contribute to a vibrant, livable and dense urban centre. Architects are also innovating in other cities around the world. Take Bjarke Ingels Group's series of "court-scrapers" in New York City and for Toronto (proposed). But we cannot rely only on architects to breed these concepts and realise these structures. Developments which truly have an impact are achieved when both design and policy are effectively married.

Back to Singapore, one finds innovation even in public-housing projects. The Singaporean architecture practice WOHA conceived of Skyville Dawson, a public-housing estate that positions densely planted terraces with mature trees every 12 stories, breaking up the building scale along its height. The result is more a vertical village than a block-tower extrusion. WOHA's latest book, "Garden City Mega City" refutes the idea that high density equals a reduced quality of life, instead calling for "high-density high-amenity" architecture.

There is also Singapore's Sky Habitat, a private high-rise residential development that multiplies the ground plane with three garden bridges crossing between two 38-storey residential towers. Each tower is stepped in profile, creating garden terraces for over one-third of the units. The accessible garden bridges allow more space for residents to spill out from their homes and enjoy the outdoors together. Sky Habitat also reclaims 80% of the ground area it has displaced in the form of terraced and shared garden spaces.

The principles of a multi-ground, three-dimensional city are not new. In the 1960s, Yona Friedman proposed the concept of La Ville Spatiale, a vision to build levitated three-dimensional structures over cities filled with housing modules, gardens, and public spaces. There is also Habitat 67 in Montreal, designed by Moshe Safdie, which is perhaps the best known built version of a three-dimensional building system. Habitat 67's mission was cleverly "for everyone a garden".

So, can we consider shared spaces up high the true public realm, or do these spaces suffer from privilege -- environments under watch, and controlled? And in locales where planting trees and plants may not be sustainable due to climate and geography, what else can we propose aside from putting trees on buildings? Are there other opportunities to innovate with commercial and public programming at height to create a more intricate and interesting three-dimensional experience of the city?

It is clear that the richest innovation stems from dialogue between policy-makers and designers, working in close collaboration with one another. The planning parameters do not need to be complex, and as seen in Singapore, even a simple policy can have a profound impact, ensuring that buildings that are interconnected and complementary to each another better fit their surroundings. As our urban centres continue to grow more "mega" and become more densely populated, it is critical that we continue to prioritise these explorations and experiments, as they will ensure the cities of the future remain friendly for us all. The Mark News

Jaron Lubin joined Safdie Architects in 2004, and was named principal in 2012.

Jaron Lubin

Principal at Safdie Architects

Jaron Lubin joined Safdie Architects in 2004, and was named principal in 2012.

Do you like the content of this article?

Rising stars emerge at President's Cup 2022

The President’s Cup 2022 has been underway since last month at the Thai Polo & Equestrian Club, Pattaya, with Harald Link, president of the Thailand Equestrian Federation (TEF), declaring that the competition is truly back on track.


1,663 new Covid inpatients, 30 more deaths

The country registered 30 more Covid-19 fatalities and 1,663 new cases admitted to hospitals during the previous 24 hours, the Public Health Ministry announced on Monday morning.


EEC schemes to get govt hurry-up

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha will today chair a meeting of the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) Policy Committee to follow up on progress in investment projects.