Common area management fee matters
published : 9 May 2018 at 13:02
writer: Dexter Norville
Common area management fee (CAM fee) is a much-discussed topic among developers, investors, owners, renters, agents and management providers, all of whom have a standpoint on it.
Collected from the total sellable/leasable area within a property, a CAM fee is the main source of fund used to operate and manage the property. This covers such things as common area utility costs, security, cleaning, landscaping, management staff, pest control, and engineering maintenance etc.
CAM fees can vary upon many factors such as asset types, classes and sizes.
Office buildings generally require a higher CAM fee (often referred to as a service charge or is part of the service charge) than residential developments. This is because operating expenses are substantially higher in office buildings due to the sheer size of the buildings and the fact they have many more complex systems such as chilled water systems, large carparks and relatively bigger mechanical and electrical equipment.
For residential condominiums, CAM fees vary across the different segments. In Bangkok, present fees range between 35 and 45 baht per square metre in the mid- to low-end segments, 50 and 65 baht in the upper-mid bracket, 65 baht and 80 baht for the high-end segment, and 80 baht to 160 baht in the luxury and ultra-luxury segments.
Obviously, higher-class condominiums require a higher CAM fee as most of them provide greater levels of services, and the upkeep and maintenance of the building require more attention and better-trained personnel to look after the building and meet the co-owners' expectations that are generally higher.
In resort areas like Phuket, CAM fees for condominium developments can be higher. Due to relatively smaller sizes in general, most condominium buildings in Phuket have less area to collect income from while providing the same or similar levels of facilities. Moreover, the cost of staffing is inflated because competition for skilled manpower is high as the island is a tourist hot spot.
In Pattaya, as the buildings are generally bigger than those in Phuket, a reasonable rate of CAM fee for a mid-level-grade condominium would be in the region of 60 per sq m.
Obviously, CAM fees in larger residential buildings are typically lower -- the bigger the net sellable area is the better chance a building will have economies of scales.
Some tricky situations for developers of condominiums is when a building is developed and positioned to be within the luxury or high-end segment but the net area is quite small. Common areas still need to be maintained to a high standard and meet the owner’s high expectations.
Some developers may set a low CAM fee because they intend to use the low fee as a potential selling point to attract buyers of units in the project.
Co-owner committees may underestimate the running cost of the property, or want to cut operating costs. Unfortunately, this wrong approach could put the property at risk in the longer term, and will eventually reflect negatively on the building and its overall asset value.
To ensure an appropriate CAM fee at the outset, many developers engage a qualified property management consultant who will help develop the correct operating structures and plan the budgets ahead of their sales campaign.
This enables them to explain to their customers so that they can understand that there has been a level of thought based behind the CAM fee and what services are available within the property.
Likewise, co-owner committees can benefit from talking to their service provider or a good consultant to see if their current CAM fees are sufficient or reasonable and also discuss strategies for funding the operations of the property for the foreseeable future.
Qualified property management consultants can be identified by their past and present experience and reference within the market that is relevant to the property. Consultants that have an impressive track record in luxury asset management may not necessarily be able to handle a mid- to low-end development well, and vice versa.