Rolling out broadband access is money well spent

Rolling out broadband access is money well spent

If you were setting global priorities, what would you choose? Chances are that you would go for high-profile issues like health, nutrition and education. Obviously, no-one is going to ignore pressing problems in these areas, but there are other targets which could make a real difference to people's lives. Perhaps surprisingly, one of these is broadband access.

Achieving mobile internet access for 60% of the developing world over the next 15 years could make these countries US$22 trillion (768 trillion baht) richer. Thailand is already close to achieving this mark, with 52% of the population already hooked up on mobile broadband in 2013. Reaching 60% coverage could mean an extra benefit of $56 billion for the country. And such improvement in the lives and earning potential of poor people could indirectly help with the other challenges; more prosperous people tend to be healthier, better fed and better educated.

Choosing between a large number of competing priorities, each of them strongly championed by different interest groups, is not easy, but it is vitally important. One hundred and ninety-three governments will meet at a UN meeting in September to finalise a list of targets for the world to meet by 2030. Getting to a list of targets which are achievable and give the most bang for the buck is crucial for the lives of the world's poorest. My think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus Centre, has asked 60 teams of economists, including several Nobel laureates, to investigate which targets would do the most good for every dollar spent, to help this meeting make the best choices.

Professor Emmanuelle Auriol and Alexia Lee Gonzalez Fanfalone from the Toulouse School of Economics suggest in a new analysis that broadband could very well be one of the best investments for the future.

The rapid rollout of broadband services over little more than a decade has transformed the lives of people in the industrialised world and there is every reason to expect that developing countries could benefit at least as much. Economic models project that tripling mobile broadband coverage in the developing world could create over 10 million direct jobs. The ways the internet would be used in the developing world would be different, but just as transformative as those in the West. Access to market information can ensure farmers know the market price for their surplus crops so they are not cheated by unscrupulous traders, and fishermen can land their catch at the port offering the best price.

But a digital divide still persists between developed and developing regions of the world, and closing it could give a big boost to development. For example, while mobile broadband is used by over 83% of people in the industrialised world, penetration is only 21% in developing countries. A World Bank study showed that a 10% increase in broadband penetration increased GDP growth by 1.4% in low to medium income countries. Although currently behind the rich economies, developing countries have the advantage that they do not have to invest in expensive fibre-optic cables in what is called the "last mile" or access part of the network, but go instead straight to mobile broadband.

Mobile phone use is already spreading rapidly in developing countries, avoiding the need for old-style fixed infrastructure, and data services can use the same system. In China, three quarters of internet users access it via mobile phones already, and in Ethiopia and Uganda, four out of five use the mobile internet. The need for the high infrastructure costs of a fixed-line data network can be largely avoided.

Increasing mobile broadband about three-fold in developing regions will have a significant cost of about $1.3 trillion. This is simply the cost of the extra infrastructure needed to hook up about three billion more connections to the internet. However, it will also increase GDP growth. By 2020, the benefits would be almost half a trillion dollars annually, and these would increase further towards 2030. Over the coming decades the total benefit would reach about $22 trillion. For every dollar spent on mobile broadband, the academics estimate a benefit of $17. Investing in mobile broadband for the developing world looks like a really smart move.

Jobs are created directly in the organisation providing the network and indirectly in the supply chain. Once in place, broadband helps to create more jobs in the wider economy. Companies become more efficient and innovative. All these factors increase the rate of economic growth. It is difficult to estimate the full impact, but benefits are likely to be larger and wider-spread than those mentioned.

There is a strong case for governments looking to the next set of global targets to include broadband access. Broadband has become a vital platform technology which helps to boost economic growth, has the potential to lift people out of poverty and can make real improvements to the delivery of health, nutrition and education services.


Bjorn Lomborg is the president of the Copenhagen Consensus Centre. www.copenhagenconsensus.com.

Bjorn Lomborg

President of the Copenhagen Consensus Centre

Bjorn Lomborg is the president of the Copenhagen Consensus Centre.

Do you like the content of this article?
COMMENT (2)

Asia’s factories grind forward amid Lunar New Year disruptions

Manufacturing engines across Asia ground ahead last month, with most continuing to expand during the volatile Lunar New Year holiday period.

15:05

Yemen donor conference seeks $3.85 billion to prevent famine

DUBAI: The United Nations said it hopes to raise $3.85 billion on Monday to prevent large-scale famine in Yemen, warning that life in the war-ravaged nation was unbearable, with children enduring a "special kind of hell".

13:45

Beijing using Covid-19 'to obstruct foreign journalists'

BEIJING: China is using the Covid-19 pandemic as "yet another way to control journalists", a press group said Monday, warning that Beijing has introduced extra surveillance and restrictions for health reasons as tools to frustrate reporters' work.

13:45