Why no women?
Re: "PPRP renegades unveil party: Sang Anakot Thai aims to heal economy", (BP, Jan 20). Your front-page photograph illustrating the formation of the new Palang Pracharath Party (Building Thailand's Future) is a line-up of old and bold politicians from the past -- all of them men.
It would seem the PPRP intends to "build Thailand's future" without input from the female of the species.
There is some evidence to support the claim that Thailand was one of the the first countries in the world -- perhaps the second after New Zealand -- to introduce female suffrage: The Local Administration Act of 1897 gave female suffrage in village elections in Thailand, and de facto nationally.
Certainly, by 1932 Thai women nationally had the right to vote, but 90 years later, women have minor representation on the Thai political landscape, which is dominated by men.
The Women in Parliaments (https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking) 2019 index lists Thailand as 181st out of 190, with women holding 13 of the 240 seats in the Thai lower house. Unbelievably, Rwanda has top billing, with a 61.3% majority of seats held by women, followed by Cuba in second place, with 53.2% of seats held by women.
It seems that Thai women, who are dominant is so many other areas of Thai culture, society and business, hold out little hope of advancement in Thai politics and parliamentary seats, as long as the mores of the PPRP and its ilk prevail.