Scholz looks to quell coalition divisions
published : 26 Mar 2023 at 21:45
BERLIN - German Chancellor Olaf Scholz will battle on Sunday to put out the fires threatening his government as the three-way coalition meets for crisis talks on a growing series of disputes.
A little more than a year after taking office, the relationship between Scholz's Social Democrats (SPD) and his governing partners, the Greens and the pro-business FDP, looks more strained than ever.
Earlier this week, Vice Chancellor and Economy Minister Robert Habeck of the Greens accused his coalition partners of blocking progress, while the FDP's deputy chief Wolfgang Kubicki compared the Green politician to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Kubicki later apologised but the damaging row underlines the state of the three-way coalition -- the first in Germany's post-war history.
The alliance got off to a good start in December 2021 under the motto of their coalition agreement -- "Dare for more progress".
It was put to a tough test when Russia invaded Ukraine just two months on, upending decades of German economic and political certainties.
But tensions have since soared -- particularly between the Greens and the FDP.
The two are unnatural bedfellows, with the former set on environmental commitments to phase out nuclear energy and combustion engines, and the latter promoting very different economic policies.
"Everywhere you look in the government there are fires," German magazine Spiegel said, with the partners wrangling over priorities and struggling for compromises.
- Boiling over -
It could not be "that in a coalition of progress only one coalition partner is responsible for progress and the others for preventing progress", Habeck said at a Green party event during the week.
Sunday's talks would be a good opportunity to "overcome blockages" on key issues, Habeck also told broadcaster ARD, blasting the coalition's record and policy leaks.
At the root of Habeck's discontent is a controversial project put forward by his ministry to ban the installation of new oil and gas boilers from 2024 -- a year earlier than previously planned.
The accelerated move from fossil fuels to greener technologies such as heat pumps would be accompanied by a multi-billion-euro package of financial support for switchers, Habeck has promised.
But the idea has caused ructions within the coalition, with critics underlining the costs involved.
"The plans must go back to the drawing board and be fundamentally revised," Finance Minister and FDP leader Christian Lindner said after a policy draft was leaked to German daily Bild.
As tempers frayed, SPD general secretary said the partners needed to "find a new way of working".
"This is an appeal to all three parties in government -- these public arguments must stop now," he said.
- 'Explosive material' -
The boiler bust-up is only one item on a growing list of disagreements, including pension reform, child benefits and cuts to red tape.
The parties agreed in their coalition agreement to speed up the approval process for key projects to revitalise Germany's creaking infrastructure.
But while the FDP would like to see support for more new motorways, the Greens want to privilege more climate-friendly projects.
The FDP have also rallied opposition against European Union plans to ban cars with internal combustion engines from 2035, finally wringing a compromise solution out of Brussels on Saturday despite Green scepticism.
Spending demands from across government -- including more money for Germany's sclerotic armed forces -- have made the maths harder for the finance minister.
Lindner, who has insisted on a return to Germany's strict constitutional spending limits, was forced earlier in March to push back the publication of spending plans for 2024 due to a lack of agreement.
Divisions over the budget threaten to bring an end to the coalition, if Scholz fails to back his finance minister, political scientist Juergen Falter told Bild.
Much of the coalition's discord could be traced back to the fact that "the ideas of the Greens and the FDP simply do not fit together", he said.
Bringing their opposing views together was always going to be difficult, according to Falter.
"Three-way alliances automatically have more explosive material," he said.