Don't pay for garbage
Re: "Engagement needed", (PostBag, Aug 22).
I must agree with Mario that we should do everything to promote open access to new knowledge and research. Sadly, international university rankings have resulted in mushrooming of all kinds of research journals -- the good, the bad and the ugly.
Journal status based on benchmarks, such as indexing, citations, and impact factor has turned into an industry where anyone can pay US$300-$500 (9,000-15,000 baht) to get their garbage published. Anyone with little intelligence will not be interested in paying to access the garbage dumps called peer-reviewed journals. Paid access to a journal is similar to paying for a walk in a red-light district, just for looking around! Or strolling for some excitement.
The main purpose of any research is to enhance the knowledge and understanding of trends, or share improvements in services, or products. Quite often good research also leads to new innovations that can solve problems facing our societies and improve the quality of life.
Regarding the case in point, Covid-19 vaccine research, more people read about new developments through "open access" media channels than subscription-based journals or channels. Open access channels are suitable for broadcasting research work to a wider audience, free of cost.
Thai Ministry of Education and agencies like the Thai Journal Citation Index (TCI) must let go of their obsession with current indexing giants, Scopus, Mendeley, Citfactor, ERIC, and other channels. Thai academia and TCI should promote publications in open access journals or channels which promote the broadcast of one's research work to a wider audience without any charge.
And for the purposes of the promotion of a university faculty, the ministry and TCI should give more importance to publication in open access channels.