Preserve Thai land
Re: "Selling the family silver?", (Editorial, Sept 27).
Thailand does not allow direct foreign ownership of land. Since I am a foreigner, this policy works against my interests as I would love to own a freehold home in Thailand. But I have always admired this Thai policy because it protects the interests of Thai citizens. That is precisely what the government should be doing.
In many countries worldwide, there are appalling numbers of empty homes and properties purchased by investors. They may not need to live there, and they may never intend to. But when investors purchase property, it becomes unavailable for would-be homeowners.
I also have a different point of view to offer. Market competition can be beneficial and improve efficiency, but the global and domestic economies must be considered separately to protect Thai citizens. Foreign investors will gladly walk through any door you leave open. As I mentioned, I would like to buy a freehold house. What do you think would happen if investors were offered a choice between apartments and land? Would any foreigner ever buy another condo? How many well-heeled foreigners might there be worldwide that are capable of investing a few million dollars in an infrequently used "vacation home" upcountry? And what would this scenario do to the price of real estate for average Thais, not to mention the poorest and most at-risk?
Thailand appears to be taking reasoned steps towards rebuilding the economy. I am gratified that although there are differences of opinion about what approaches to take and what to prioritise, there is a vibrant, spirited debate and well-intentioned effort. Please do not compromise Thai ownership of the country for a one-time gain of foreign investment. Preserve Thai land for Thailand.
PC wins every time
Re: "Cross purposes", (PostBag, Oct 5).
MBH claims that the reason the Red Cross does not want male homosexuals donating blood is because the Red Cross has fallen for right-wing propaganda that only homosexuals transmit HIV. That is unmitigated nonsense!
No one in recent times has said that heterosexuals can't get HIV. Heterosexuals who are intravenous drug users, as well as other high-risk heterosexuals, are also asked not to donate blood.
The politically correct view is that we're all in one big risk group for getting HIV. Therefore, it is bigotry to note that the blood of a male homosexual or intravenous drug user is more likely to be HIV-positive than the blood of a cloistered nun. While that assumption is insane, whenever we have to choose between political correctness or medical correctness (this applies to Covid-19 as well) political correctness wins every time.
Nok Air's nosedive
Re: "Nok flight games?", (PostBag, Oct 2).
Not only has Nok Air been criticised recently about cancelling flights far in advance of their scheduled departure, they now do not answer their phones. We wanted to confirm travel requirements. When I called I was on hold for half an hour before I decided to hang up.
My wife also called on the Thai side and had the line disconnected several times before she also gave up.
If Nok wants to stay in business I would strongly advise them to get their act together.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
All letter writers must provide a full name and address. All published correspondence is subject to editing at our discretionSEND